Chapter 1
History and Koch
Four questions asked in order over two centuries: can we see them, where do they come from, do they cause disease, and what do we do about it. Chapter 1 is those four questions and the people who answered them.
Two centuries on one rule
Who did what
If a name comes up on the exam, it comes up attached to one specific contribution. Learn the pairing, not the biography.
Seeing them at all
Before anyone could argue about microbes, someone had to see one.
| Who | When | Credited with | What they actually did |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Hooke | b. 1635 | Named the cell | His drawings of cork through a microscope introduced the word "cell" and started cell theory. |
| Antonie van Leeuwenhoek | b. 1632 | First saw living microbes | Ground his own lenses and described the "animalcules" in pond water, saliva and scrapings from his own teeth. |
Where do they come from?
A two-century argument, settled by an experiment that let air in but kept dust out.
| Who | When | Credited with | What they actually did |
|---|---|---|---|
| Francesco Redi | 1626–1697 | First challenge to spontaneous generation | Covered jars of meat so flies could not reach them. No maggots appeared, so the maggots came from flies, not the meat. |
| John Needham | b. 1713 | Argued for spontaneous generation | Boiled broth still grew microbes, which he took as proof they arose on their own — his flasks were open to the air. |
| Lazzaro Spallanzani | b. 1729 | Argued against it | Boiled broth in sealed flasks and nothing grew. Critics said he had excluded the "vital force" in air. |
| Louis Pasteur | b. 1822 | Settled the question | His swan-necked flasks let air in but trapped dust in the bend. The broth stayed sterile for months, and grew only when the neck was broken or tipped. Spontaneous generation was wrong. |
Do they cause disease?
Establishing that a particular microbe causes a particular disease — not merely that it is present.
| Who | When | Credited with | What they actually did |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Koch | b. 1843 | Linked one microbe to one disease | Found the cause of anthrax and established the etiologic relationship between a microbe and a specific disease. His postulates are the standard for proving causation. |
What do we do about it?
The practical consequence: wash, sterilise, vaccinate, and treat.
| Who | When | Credited with | What they actually did |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Lister | 1827–1912 | Antiseptic surgery | Sprayed carbolic acid in the operating theatre and cut surgical deaths sharply. |
| Ignaz Semmelweis | 1818–1865 | Handwashing | Showed that doctors washing their hands between the mortuary and the delivery ward stopped childbed fever. He was ignored in his lifetime. |
| Florence Nightingale | 1820–1910 | Sanitation and nursing | Used statistics to show that sanitary conditions, not battle wounds, killed most soldiers. |
| John Snow | 1813–1858 | Epidemiology | Traced a cholera outbreak to the Broad Street pump and removed its handle — the founding act of epidemiology. |
| Edward Jenner | 1749–1823 | Vaccination | Used cowpox material to protect against smallpox, giving us the word vaccine, from vacca, a cow. |
| Paul Ehrlich | 1854–1915 | Chemotherapy | Searched for a "magic bullet" that would kill a microbe without harming the patient, and found salvarsan for syphilis. |
Koch’s postulates
Four steps, in this order. They prove an etiologic relationship — that one microbe causes one disease, rather than merely turning up alongside it.
- 1The microorganism must be observed in every case of the disease.
- 2It must be isolated and grown in pure culture.
- 3The pure culture, when inoculated into an animal, must reproduce the disease.
- 4The microorganism must be recovered from the diseased animal.
What they cannot do
Also Koch’s
- Simple staining techniques
- The first photomicrograph of bacteria
- The first photomicrograph of bacteria in diseased tissue
- Using steam to sterilise media
- Using Petri dishes
- Techniques for transferring bacteria
- The idea of bacteria as distinct species
What counts as alive
Chapter 1 opens with this, and it is worth a mark because growth and reproduction are not the same thing.
Growth
Increase in size
Reproduction
Increase in number
Responsiveness
The ability to respond to changes in the environment
Metabolism
Controlled chemical reactions
Growth is an increase in size; reproduction is an increase in number. A cell forming an endospore is doing neither — one cell becomes one spore, so the population never rises. That distinction turns up on the exam in more than one place.